IMG_7108
1200px-Exterior_-_Massachusetts_Archives_-_IMG_9242
IMG_6554

In the United States, federal policy action to address climate change has been very limited; the action has been almost entirely at the state level. My dissertation examines the politics of state-level climate policymaking in three states that are among those that have taken the most expansive action thus far: California, Massachusetts and Oregon. Given that the political power of business interests is generally assumed to be the impediment to federal climate policy, I ask why the same interests have not prevented so much progress in the states. I find that, even in the so-called "leading states," there is significant variation in the quality of the policies that have been adopted. Some are ambitious, stringent, and enforceable while others are symbolic, voluntary, and purely aspirational. Ultimately, I explain this variation in terms of key differences in the policy preferences and political power of key fragments of the business community (most pivotal is the role of investor-owned utilities). I also account for the role of social movement organizations, public opinion, and a range of other interest groups, thus taking into consideration the full range of "inputs" into the policymaking process. The project has thus far relied on legislative and regulatory text, thousands of pages of archival documents, and 111 in-depth interviews with key actors including legislators and their staff, executive branch agency heads and their staff, environmental advocates, and lobbyists representing a wide range of business interests with a stake in these policies. This research contributes to key theoretical debates in environmental sociology, political sociology, and the study of social movements.

 

Other projects include, with two undergraduate research assistants, an exploration of the tension between environmental justice-oriented and market-oriented climate advocacy organizations, as well as a project, led by Heather Schoenfeld and Michael Campbell, on variation in the pace of reform when it comes to state-level criminal justice and incarceration policies.